Having a laptop is mint. Still being all cosy in bed with tunes and a pipe is no longer an excuse not to write, so here we are:
There's a whispered line in a rage against the machine song that says:
anger is a gift
Now while I can certainly agree with this in principle it's a gift I generally try to avoid in practice.
What with my depression and the variety of things that drive it, my getting truly angry tends to result in an explosive loss of self control and some new scars for my collection.
There is however, as always, a middle ground, and that's the smouldering, seething rage that bubbles away somewhere just above my stomach for much of the time, including now.
For many years I have visited an apparent theoretical impasse and every time I have shrugged and walked away, irritated at my inability to find a way through. (I'll get it one day though, or die trying.)
Tolerance and understanding have been the foundations of humanity's journey from beasts to slightly cleaner, more talkative beasts.
Clearly however human attitudes are heterogeneous, diversity being another essential component of our nature.
The problem is then, that those who are tolerant, those who seek to understand are always going to be shafted by the intolerant and ignorant.
Those who live in the direction of progress and improving the world through these fundamental channels will always suffer while those who actively oppose happiness through their own selfish mindset will succeed.
Add to this my relentless belief that for any social system to be truly successful it must be 100% inclusive, ie. you can't just shoot all the bastards, no matter how tempting it may seem, and it's an absolute fucking pickle.
How do the tolerant and inquisitive humans avoid getting shafted by the selfish and ignorant throwbacks, without joining them?
Clearly this is abject polarisation, something I regularly rail against, but it's recognised as such and so, with the caveat of it's definition in place, can be a useful tool.
Now I've banged on before about 'my' culture, about how across the globe and throughout the history of humanity, groups of scruffy people have popped up who have rejected material wealth and the power structures of religion and politics, choosing instead to make peace and happiness the focus of their lives.
I've also whinged on about how each resurgence of this counter culture, (which I believe to be the next step on the evolutionary ladder by the way,) has been persecuted out of existence.
Well it's all still true and I'm still really fucked off by it all. My trip to the Dam was a wake up call for me because I felt like, in a small way for a brief time, I was somehow freer to live according to my beliefs, to be myself without relentless compromises of convenience.
So here are three examples of flames that boil my blood:
fuck the kids
Now it's no secret that I'm no fan of organised religion and the Catholic Church have kindly provided me with quite a few reasons to sustain this view recently.
The latest example of their delusional tendencies, (sorry guys, no mater how fancy your hats are, your reign of world domination is long since over,) concerns same sex couples raising kids.
There's been a fair bit of Christian protest about new legislation opposing discrimination on the grounds of sexuality and it makes me want to puke.
listen to what's being said:
I believe that homosexuality is wrong, they say, so I'm entitled to express that belief by refusing to treat gays with the same degree of respect I would anyone else.
look at what that really means:
Of course because this is a 'religious' belief, it's seen by many as inviolable. And yet if you change the context even slightly the abject absurdity becomes clear.
I'm sure that many BNP activists truly believe that it is absolutely wrong that people with slightly darker skin should live in the UK.
Do they then have the right not to serve Asian people? To refuse to take the custom of black people? Of course not.
stop the madness:
We're all entitled to our beliefs, and entitled to express them. We are NOT entitled to enforce our beliefs on other people however.
If you believe homosexuality is wrong I suggest you don't have sex with people of your own gender. That's it, end of.
If you don't like my beliefs, and find yourself incapable of exposing yourself to things you don't like, then I suggest you don't read my blog.
If you find a TV programme offensive then I suggest you change the channel.
What makes religion worse than other forms of fascism(1) is the quite unbelievable arrogance.
The inherent assumption behind the argument of religious types that they're entitled to hate these people and abuse those I that their point of view is unequivocally correct.
To correct myself in fact what i should have said when quoting them above was not 'I believe homosexuality is wrong' but rather 'homosexuality IS wrong'.
Basically they're saying, my definitions of right and wrong are absolute and everyone else in the entire world must bow down and respect them.
Can anyone seriously tell me that these people aren't delusional mentalists of the worst kind?
The Catholic Church's most recent attempt to blackmail the government basically says, if you make us treat same sex couples like everyone else we will instantly close all our adoption agencies and turn our backs on the children they serve.
Now this organisation that claims to be the embodiment of the teachings of Jesus which, (and yes I have read the New Testament actually so bite me,) are all about tolerance and common sense.(2)
From reading the same book as them I have to say i do not think Jesus would be cool with people saying, in his name, these people are sub human and we hate them so much we'd rather see innocent children suffer than include them in our mindset.
Oh but they can't change, they're practices are age old and absolute.
Only that's not true is it? The Spanish Inquisition, slavery, both fundamental aspects of the Catholic Church that they have since admitted probably weren't that cool after all.
Anyway, I could bitch about this all day but this is only the first example.
prison works
The words of the man who ensured that Jamie Bulger's killers were released early.(3)
So our prisons are full, we're using police stations and army bases and even letting people off custodial sentences altogether.
listen to what's being said:
The government are frantically trying to find more prison places mainly by looking to buy two more prison ships.
They're also bragging about how they're locking up more people and for longer, taking a firm stand against crime etc etc.
look at what that really means:
Does it strike anyone else as odd that there is no discussion within all of this as to why so many are breaking the law in the first place?
The inherent assumption behind all this is that criminals just appear, they just are, a fact of life.
Murderers, rapists and, worst of all apparently, drug dealers, just fall from the sky. A plague over which we have no control, we just have to deal with as best we can.
Now no matter how impressive the soundbites may feel, this is the truth behind them and it's insane.
stop the madness:
So we don't have enough room in our prisons.
Well it's a metaphor I've used before but it's no less true nor fitting here:
If you're in a rowboat and it's sinking what do you do?
Do you just bail the water out until fatigue floors you and you sink, or do plug the fucking hole?!
Yes criminals chose to break the law and are responsible for their actions, but society plays a significant part as well.
There are quite clearly myriad contributing factors but I feel a significant one is, of course, consumer capitalism.
A fundamental aspect that system is the creation of a privileged minority and a needy majority, winners can after all only be defined as such by the existence of losers.
Stress, inequality and hardship will inevitably lead to criminality, especially when central legislator represents only the interests of the privileged minority.
what must they think of us?
listen to what's being said:
Between overflowing prisons and looters on the beach what must the rest of the world think of us?
This has been a popular refrain of late, people ashamed of what this country has become. Red faced in the eyes of the world that our fellow citizens choose to behave in such a way.
look at what that really means:
Well firstly there's the hangover from empire, the assumption that anyone else in the world gives monkey's about us or what we get up to.
More significantly however there's the idea that any kind of judgement we do receive from the rest of the world would be defined by issues such as these.
Aren't there perhaps other things, other contributions we make to the state of the world that might have more influence?
stop the madness:
You know what makes me ashamed of my country? The fact that we're helping to kill Iraqi children in the most horrific ways possible EVERY SINGLE DAY!
Not to mention the vast number of other ways we aid death and across the globe via both direct military intervention and, more commonly, financial interests.
The fact that this goes on, funded by our taxes and, through the pretence of a representative democracy, in our names every day and yet we're worried about what people will think of us nicking some stuff off a beach screams volumes about the blinkered nature of our society.
And so the struggle continues. Living my life surrounded by people who habitually mistake tolerance and forgiveness for weakness, people who are instinctively suspicious of any concept that cannot be expressed in three words or less.
The wilfully self centred who wear their ignorance on their sleeve like a badge of honour, those who would joyfully destroy everything and take us all with them if they felt it was in their interests.
My trip to the Dam was inspirational. I still haven't found a way past this obstacle to our evolution but an idea is starting to form.
The system has to be inclusive, I have to tolerate the bastards, but that doesn't mean I have to give my life over to the service of mentalism.
I can carve out a space for myself, in fact I must, a vital bubble of personal mental space to save me from drowning in their bile.
This blog is a start, a loft in the Dam would be a major enclave, hopefully I can get from one to the other by way of writing and refusing to jump through quite so many hoops.
grrrrr...
![]()
footnote
(1) fascism is elitism and, by definition, organised religion includes the creation an elite, beware all forms of silly hats, they tend to sit on heads full of intolerance and violent insecurity,
(2) as much as it sounds like a T-shirt, I do believe that Jesus was a hippy, basically another eruption of the counter culture that's been horrifically corrupted and wilfully misinterpreted over time.
(3) whilst Home Secretary, Michael Howard got such a hard on from the power he had that his brain was deprived of oxygen, subsequently he responded to concerns that the sentences handed down to the two child killers were too light not by going through the proper motions but instead just tacking on a few more years,
this insane act of despotism was, quite necessarily, over turned by the European courts and so the killers escaped what the people of the UK felt was an appropriate sentence,



